VIDEO Thune: Senate to Overturn California Waiver Rules

Senator Jon Thune
Share This Article

WASHINGTONย โ€” U.S. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) today delivered the following remarks on the Senate floor.

Thuneโ€™s remarks below (as delivered):

โ€œMr. President, this week weโ€™re going to be moving to take up Congressional Review Act resolutions to overturn Clean Air Act preemption waivers the Environmental Protection Agency granted to California that allow California to dictate emissions standards for the whole country โ€“ effectively imposing a nationwide electric vehicle mandate. 

โ€œNow, Clean Air Act waivers are nothing new, Mr. President.

โ€œThe Clean Air Act allowed for waivers to address specific pollution problems, and over the decades a number of them have been granted.

โ€œBut the waivers the Biden EPA handed to California on the Biden administrationโ€™s way out the door go far beyond the scope Congress contemplated in the Clean Air Act. 

โ€œThe waivers in question allow California to implement a stringent electric vehicle mandate, which โ€“ given Californiaโ€™s size and the fact that a number of other states have signed on to Californiaโ€™s mandate โ€“ would end up not just affecting the state of California, but the whole country.

โ€œUnder Californiaโ€™s electric vehicle mandate, automakers around the country would be forced to close down a substantial part of their traditional vehicle production, with serious consequences.

โ€œDiminished economic output.

โ€œJob losses.

โ€œDeclining tax revenues.

โ€œAnd that, Mr. President, is just the start.

โ€œConsumers around the country would face fewer choices, higher prices, and reduced automobile availability.

โ€œAnd our already shaky electric grid would quickly face huge new burdens from the surge in new electric vehicles โ€“ if, of course, automakers were able to ramp up production as fast as California wants them to, and charging stations, which typically take several years to approve, could be built in time.

โ€œMr. President, our nation is already facing serious problems on the energy supply front.

โ€œWe are, to quote a Washington Post headline from last March, โ€˜running out of power,โ€™ as a surge in demand and the premature retirement of fossil fuel-fired power plants push us to the brink.

โ€œOur electric grid is simply not in a position to absorb a huge surge in electric vehicles.

โ€œUnfortunately that didnโ€™t seem to register with President Biden, who implemented a nationwide electric vehicle mandate that the Trump EPA is currently working to undo.

โ€œBut while the Biden EPAโ€™s EV mandate was bad, Mr. President, Californiaโ€™s is much worse.

โ€œAnd if we donโ€™t act, the consequences to our economy, to consumers, and to our electricity supply could be devastating.

โ€œThe House, Mr. President, has already passed a CRA resolution to repeal Californiaโ€™s mandate โ€“ and the situation is so grave that not just Republicans but 35 Democrats supported this repeal.

โ€œBut here in the Senate, Mr. President, Democrats are attempting to derail a repeal by throwing a tantrum over a supposed procedural problem.

โ€œThe California waivers are not rules, Democrats claim, and thus the Congressional Review Act cannot be used to repeal them.

โ€œMr. President, letโ€™s be very clear.

โ€œThe EPA has submitted the waivers to Congress as rules โ€“ which is all that Congress has ever needed to decide to consider something under the Congressional Review Act.

โ€œThe House, as I said, passed a Congressional Review Act resolution of disapproval โ€“ a resolution that garnered 35 Democrat votes in the House and was passed without objection from the House parliamentarian. 

โ€œAnd there can be no question that these waivers are rules in substance, given their widespread effects.

โ€œBut it is true that we are facing something of a novel situation.

โ€œBecause for the first time ever, the Government Accountability Office has decided to insert itself into the process and affirmatively declare that an agency rule submitted to Congress as a rule is not a rule.

โ€œItโ€™s an extraordinary deviation from precedent for an agency that should be defending Congressโ€™ power instead of constraining it.

โ€œAnd frankly, Mr. President, I think we need to act to ensure that this intrusion into the Congressional Review Act process doesnโ€™t become a habit, and that the Senate doesnโ€™t end up transferring its decision-making power on CRA resolutions to the Government Accountability Office.

โ€œThatโ€™s why this week I intend to bring the question of GAOโ€™s unprecedented interference to the floor. 

โ€œBut in the meantime, I want to make one thing very clear.

โ€œThis debate, Mr. President, is not about destroying Senate procedure, or any other hysterical claim that Democrats are making.

โ€œAnd I have to say that my colleaguesโ€™ newfound interest in defending Senate procedure is touching โ€“ if a touch surprising.

โ€œAfter all, itโ€™s only last year that Democrats were planning to destroy one of the bedrocks of the Senate, the legislative filibuster.

โ€œAnd of course Democratsโ€™ concern about overruling the parliamentarian is a bit unexpected, given Democratsโ€™ documented history of attempting to do exactly that.

โ€œBut I am glad to see Democrats demonstrating an interest in safeguarding the Senate.

โ€œHowever, Mr. President, the fact of the matter is that their purported concerns here are entirely misplaced.

โ€œWe are not talking about doing anything to erode the institutional character of the Senate; in fact, we are talking about preserving the Senateโ€™s prerogatives.

โ€œAnd I would like to see senators from both parties vote to uphold the Senateโ€™s rights under the Congressional Review Act โ€“ even if Democrats support the California Green New Deal rule in question.

โ€œMr. President, the California waivers rules are an improper expansion of a limited Clean Air Act authority and would endanger consumers, our economy, and our nationโ€™s energy supply.

โ€œAnd I look forward to overturning these rules in the very near future.โ€


ย 

Similar Stories